Archive

Archive for August, 2004

Commentary Track #9

August 27th, 2004

This post relates to Gilman’s Model: The Fotonovel.

ALAIN: This is the strongest ensemble scene in my entire corps of short and feature films, if not the strongest ensemble scene ever filmed. Or even envisionable. The chemistry between the acteurs is perfect — a delicate dance of glances, of things said and unsaid, of wishes unwished and dreams undreamed.

RYAN: Now, why did I introduce myself as Keziah here?

ALAIN: Ah, yes. That was a particularly subtle moment. Is it misleading, and/or is it the point? It is a rich metaphor. Perhaps the richest.

RYAN: Right, but why is it subtle? Why is it a metaphor? What does it mean?

ALAIN: Exactly.

RYAN: I had to really use the washroom for most of this scene.

Tin Foiled Uncategorized

It’s enough to be there.

August 27th, 2004

Alright, it’s my turn to weigh in (just to complete our blog quintumvirate). I disagree.

Whole-hearted dedication to a sport might be inspiring, but it’s insulting to the athlete to begrudge them a small percentage of attention to their family, or to their career, or to their life outside their sport. Kyle Shewfelt (our Gymnastics Gold winner) “dropped out” of the 2001 World Championships to finish University. The Canadian Gymnastics Federation was furious. His conclusion: “I realised that I wasn’t doing gymnastics for anyone but myself. All of my goals are MY goals and it is up to me to achieve them.

And he’s right. How many Canadians followed the World Championships, the World Cups, the Goodwill Games, the Commonwealth Games and the innumerable Gymnastic competitions of Kyle Shewfelt on his journey to the Olympics? When it’s not in your home town, or you’re not a gymnastics mom, it’s not interesting until the Olympics. Then, you’re a notch on the Canadian Medal belt, or you’re nothing at all.

Lori-Ann Muenzer has a heroic story, and I’m glad she won. I’m also glad that Martina Navratilova is there. Is Ms. Muenzer more heroic because she brought home the gold, or Ms. Navratilova because she was female Athlete of the Decade in the eighties? Is the latter supposed to be embarrassed and feel bad because she was only at the Olympics but didn’t win? Is she supposed to taste the bitter fruit of failure because she didn’t cap her career with an Olympic medal?

If the Olympics are about heroes, then it’s about individuals. It’s hardly about bragging rights for the genetic farm of your country. Or the superior infrastructure your country has developed for its top athletes. Or the political manipulations that your country can contrive to influence the judging of subjective sports.

Per capita, Canada is slightly over 10% worse in medal-winners than the United States. (We have four million non-medal winners to one medal winner in Canada; they have three and a half). That’s hardly horrifying, and probably a fair trade-off given our national priorities. Yes, Australia should be proud — that doesn’t mean we should be ashamed.

Unlike the US, Russia and China, Canada has decided not to pay our athletes for medals earned, preferring to pay for training. That’s a wise use of our tax dollars. I like to imagine that we’ve also struck a good balance between spending staggering amounts on our top athletes and providing good services to clumsy, but interested amateurs. The health care versus athletic programs has always been a red herring.

The Olympics bring out the nationalistic, ungrateful worst in us. And the best in Coca-Cola, Kodak and Samsung.

Tin Foiled BlahBlahBlah

Commentary Track #8

August 25th, 2004

This post relates to Gilman’s Model: The Fotonovel. Some writing credits belong to G. Crofton.

GEOFFREY: Where did you find these actors?

ALAIN: These were not actors – I don’t think they realized we were making a movie.

RYAN: One of them stole my hat!

ALAIN: That was unscripted.

GEOFFREY: The one on the left looks familiar.

ALAIN: He shouldn’t.

GEOFFREY: But he does.

ALAIN: But he shouldn’t.

RYAN: Isn’t that…

ALAIN: No.

DERMOTT: [shouting] Als Sie das Produkt in den Warenkorb legten, wurde es korrekterweise als lieferbar angezeigt! Wenn edoch jemand anders in der Zeit zwischen Ihrem Hineinlegen des Produkts in den Warenkorb und Ihrer Bestellabsendung dasselbe Produkt bestellt hat und der ausgewaehlte Artikel der Letzte in der jeweiligen Groesse und Farbe gewesen war, kann Ihre Bestellung nicht ausgeliefert werden?!

Tin Foiled Uncategorized

First glimpse at Gmail

August 25th, 2004

So I got my gmail address th’other day, thanks to the aforementioned kind benefactor. You all know him — he’s pure light and energy embodified, like Santa crossed with the genie of the lamp.

Anyway, <seinfeld>what’s the deal with Gmail? What sort of recently publicked multi-internet corp names their beta web mail service after an interjection derived from a shortened blaspheme? “Gee, man, I’ve got mail!” What’s up with that?</seinfeld> Here’s what’s up with Gmail:

* free
* 1 gigabyte of email storage (that’s 1,000 megabytes),
* promised IMAP or POP3 access (currently unavailable),
* smooth web interface,
* spell checking,
* strong email search tools,
* interesting email organization tools, and<
* cachet.

Let me elaborate on the last three points — with 1 gig of mail storage, you will seldom need to “clean out your inbox”. At work, I get a paltry dozens of megabytes of email space, so I need to periodically copy them into local folders, organized by subject. When a folder gets enormous, it slows down my email client significantly. When I’m looking for a filed email, I typically can’t remember where it is, so I search the whole tree.

Gmail loses this hierarchy and organizes everything either into Inbox or All Mail. New messages are in the Inbox, and they stay there until you archive them, at which point they are dumped into the big, homogenous All Mail. You can imagine that one day, you’ll have tens of thousands in this big pool.

Your old way of sorting your email into folders (usually representations of files on the hard disk) is artificial, inaccurate and time-consuming. When I search for an email, I generally scan the whole tree of folders anyway. Google has brought their expertise in search to help you find a specific mail in the huge pool of All Mail.

In addition, Gmail provides a feature that avoids the need to search: Conversations. Gmail automatically creates a context of old emails related to the email currently being read — a sort of advanced thread. It’s extremely simple to find and click related emails along the conversation you’re currently reading — so only the most recent email in your Conversation needs to be in the Inbox.

“But,” you cry, “Life without folders?! How unbearable!” Oh naive child, afraid of change, hark unto my words. What do you need folders for anyway?

If you want to have a list of important emails, you can “star” your email. This is similar to a flagged email in conventional browsers.

If you need more control over which emails are grouped together (past the context of the Conversation), you can assign a label to your email. You can assign multiple labels to a single email — beyond the grouping functionality of a single folder for one email. And deleting a label does not delete the associated messages.

Filtering works much like you would expect, although you assign stars or labels (or move your message directly into the trash) instead of moving into a folder.

Finally, the cachet. Gmail is a beta service not generally available to the public. You need an invitation. They aren’t in short supply like they were back in June, but you still need to know someone in order to get it.

I’m willing to be your Santa, so let me know if you’re looking.

Tin Foiled Technology

Fashionista

August 25th, 2004

Alright, let’s get this straight — I’ve always thought that I had considered, classic good taste: well-made T-shirts in solid colours, blue jeans without too much detail, solid blazers or suit jackets, creased dress pants with cuffs and patterned ties that were busy without being messy.

Then I had the startling realization that classic good taste isn’t a fashion sense. It’s avoiding having a fashion sense — it’s being as lazy as possible and wearing as close to a uniform every day. And my classic good taste is flawed. Flawed, I say!

However, I think Glenn is wrong. Fashion is orthogonal to Simplicity. You can have both, one or neither. Here’s my resolution: I’m going to watch the trends a bit better and keep my eyes out for what’s simple AND fashionable. The best part is that I already like watching people (come on, I’m in Paris, café capital of the world).

And where fashion meets simplicity lies gmail. Thanks to a kind benefactor, I’m in the beta and I have some invitations to give away. I’ll write a little review about it later.

Tin Foiled BlahBlahBlah

We’re big pants people!

August 24th, 2004

I have a pair of jeans that shrunk vertically, so they’re just a centimetre or two too short. Justine suggested that I roll them up and wear them as “three-quarter length jeans”.

I replied, “What?”

I know that the ladies are permitted to wear calf length pants (called “capris” or somesuch nonsense). But gentlemen? I doubt it.

She assured me that it is done. Boys can wear three-quarter length jeans, as long as they are wearing sandals without socks.

For the subsequent week, I found that she was correct. It is not only appropriate, but popular. There are three-quarter length jeans everywhere. Like with man bags, I just haven’t been paying attention for a while.

The next step is to start complaining about what kids are wearing these days.

The last step is when my “classic” jeans and T-shirt becomes as démodé as today’s “classic” polyester pantsuit.

Damn.

Tin Foiled BlahBlahBlah

Commentary Track #7

August 24th, 2004

This post relates to Gilman’s Model: The Fotonovel.

ALAIN: Here we finally see another living person — or do we? You can’t see much of the hands, but what you see is mystifying. Who is it? Why is he eating a frozen sausage. Are those beets pickled or just cooked?

GEOFFREY: I’m surprised you made me eat this after each take.

ALAIN: That was essential for your character development.

RYAN: But why did I have to eat it as well?

ALAIN: I am not on trial here.

Tin Foiled Uncategorized

Commentary Track #6

August 20th, 2004

This post relates to Gilman’s Model: The Fotonovel.

ALAIN: The journey continues. You’ll notice that the lines in this shot exist strictly within Euclidean geometry. Coincidence? Or foreshadowing? When the art director has done his job well, you can never be quite sure he’s done anything at all.

RYAN: While filming this shot, I remember having “Leaving on a Jetplane” running through my head, so I’m shaking my groove thang just a little bit. I’m surprised that they chose this take.

ALAIN: That’s exactly why we chose this take.

Tin Foiled Uncategorized

Commentary Track #5

August 20th, 2004

This post relates to Gilman’s Model: The Fotonovel.

ALAIN: Yes, the mural is a crucible within which the firm metal of Doctor Ward’s links with his own past are moltened…

RYAN: melted…

ALAIN: Right, melted. Well, not really, because the mural isn’t sufficient to really melt his belief in reality, but in his mind, what used to be concrete is less so. Slightly plastic, in fact. Nothing is as it seems. You’d be surprised who we got to do the artwork.

RYAN: We can’t mention him…

ALAIN: or her…

RYAN: yeah, or her, by name for contractual reasons. She did an excellent job, a job to be proud of, but in the end she was afraid that it would adversely affect her baby calendar business.

Tin Foiled Uncategorized

Commentary Track #4

August 20th, 2004

This post relates to Gilman’s Model: The Fotonovel.

ALAIN: The scene continues and Doctor Ward examines the fisherman’s shack.

RYAN: Err, was that supposed to be a fisherman’s shack? I don’t remember that.

GEOFFREY: May I jump in here to mention…

ALAIN: Of course, it was a fisherman’s shack. It was on the dock, wasn’t it?

RYAN: Yes, but it was clearly insane. I thought it was a unexplained metaphorical cloakroom. You know, “check your sanity at the door”.

ALAIN: The set design clearly indicates that this is a rusted fisherman’s shack. The original version had a fish and chip shop, but we dropped that as being out of our budget.

RYAN: Maybe you could tell us more about the mural?

Tin Foiled Uncategorized